Psychic Science is the belief that there are psychic capabilities at work in the world that people can use for positive purposes. It was the target of many arguments, but it remains firmly rooted in today’s culture. The scientific study of psychic science has resulted in many theories that have been proven either true or false. Some of these beliefs have been incorporated into mainstream religions, while others are still considered to be only myths. Here we will examine some of these.

Planetary lines of the forehead illustration taken from "The Complete  Illustrated Book Of The Psychic Sciences"… | Occult books, Occult science,  Spirituality books

The first known evidence of psychic science was recorded in the thirteenth century in the form of an examination performed on a monk from La belle aux Bonsai in Champagne, France. The monk, who was being held prisoner in a city jail for supposedly practicing magic, exhibited several physical symptoms that were interpreted as signs of mental illness. Two of these symptoms were a continuing loss of appetite and a dullness of the mind. Although the monk was unable to provide any explanations for these symptoms, his account was widely accepted by other people during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. It was then taken up and developed by the Vatican, which included it in the first modern textbooks on psychic science that began to be published in the fifteenth century su song ngoai hanh tinh.

Two other psychic accounts from historical times are also significant. The first is the story of St. Valentine of Aix-les-Bains, a Catholic Clergyman who was arrested on suspicion of practicing witchcraft and executed in Azusa by the sheriff of the town. The second is the story of St. Barbara, a Roman cardinal who was beheaded for Witchcraft in 1291. The accusation against her was based on the fact that she refused to give a deposition on the anniversary of her wedding to a man who claimed to have cast a spell on her. Since there was no trial before the arrest and execution of St. Valentine and St. Barbara, both their accounts become important to modern psychic readers.

Proponents of the ordinance have argued that the passage of the measure does not violate the rights of people because there is no infringement of rights of privacy or other such contentment. There is also the argument that the proposed ordinance is within the limits of what the California constitution allows as a limit on the power of the state. This is referred to as the strict construction rule. Proponents argue that the only way to restrict a power of the state is to limit its capacity to license or empower that power. The courts have upheld this approach in the past including in dictating an exception to the right of the People to hold public offices.

There are other arguments that the California constitution does not actually empower the state to ban psychic mediums altogether or to ban the use of their abilities to discern future events. The only way that the proposed ordinance could be Constitutional is if it applied to all forms of divination and removed from the use of those skills altogether. If it were found to be intended to ban all uses of spiritual and mental mediumship and clairvoyance then the provision for a preliminary notice of intent must again be applied and the implementation of the law would likely be unconstitutional.

The fact is that the proponents of the ordinance feel that it is necessary to enact it because California is seeing an increase in robberies committed with a sense of “unspoken” or “hidden” messages. In other words these criminals do not want you to know what they are planning. The argument that they have advanced is that if we cannot have free speech, then we can’t protect ourselves. If the California constitution is thought by some to be inadequate protection against defamation, then it is not without reason that it is being challenged on the basis of an equal protection claim under the Fifth Amendment. The argument that is most often advanced in constitutional litigation is that the guarantee of freedom of speech protects both the right of the press to engage in political communication and the right of citizens to petition the government for redress of grievances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *